The highlight is certainly the full version of Microsoft Office Home & Student 2013. We can find many Asus tools on the small 32 GB SSD: Live Update, Web Storage, Reading Mode, On Screen Display and some third party applications. There are also some quick-start guides and warranty information. You cannot even buy the T100 without the dock otherwise it wouldn't be a Transformer Book. Accessories / Softwareīesides the small power supply unit (20 Watts, USB connector) Asus also provides the keyboard dock (DK002H). The signal is lost with a distance of more than 15 meters outside the house and Windows indicates two out of five bars, while we had four bars with a distance of 10 meters (inside). The Broadcom 802.11 bgn SDIO adaptor does not show a perfect performance in our test. We added our test results in the sections system performance, storage solution and battery runtimes.ĭraft-N WLAN and Bluetooth 4.0 are standard nowadays and that applies for Windows 8 tablets as well. We had the chance to test the T100TA-DK007H (90NB0451-M01470) with a 500 GB HDD in the dock and 64 GB flash storage inside the tablet. Update : Review update of the version with 500GB + 64GB flash storage Which device offers the best performance for the money? Our in-depth review gives the answer. The second competitor is based on Intel's first tablet generation Z2760, the Lenovo IdeaTab Miix (64 GB) with a keyboard dock starts at 470 Euros (~$644). Temash was intended as a powerful tablet APU and rival to Intel's Atom. Competitors for the Transformer Book are classic low-cost subnotebooks with AMD's Temash APU Acer's Aspire V5-122P ( A6-1450) retails for 380 Euros (~$521). It was interesting to see that the first devices with Temash were not tablets or convertibles, but subnotebooks like the Acer Aspire V5-122P-61454G50NSS or the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Lite.Īsus is one of the first manufacturers to use Intel's new platform with its Transformer Book T100TA. Does the successor Bay Trail solve this problem? This would really improve the acceptance and the general usability of the Windows tablet and especially the keyboard convertible.ĪMD rushed ahead with Temash a few months back, the first x86 APU with four native cores. There were several devices in 2013, but all of them shared one problem: The performance was way too low for Intel Core spoiled laptop users. It was supposed to compete with ARM or Tegra-based solutions and was ready for Windows 8 at the same time. Intel revealed its first tablet platform Clover Trail at the end of 2012. For the original German review, see here.
0 Comments
If it is found unconstitutional, it could slow progress, but she thinks pressure from institutional and private investors will continue to lead to more women being named to corporate boards. She's also heard anecdotally that other companies are waiting to see how the court rules.īerkhemer-Credaire said she is confident it will be upheld. With a deadline approaching, “there’s a lot of scrambling going on,” said Betsy Berkhemer-Credaire, CEO of 50/50 Women on Boards. Still, some 40% of the largest companies in California need to add women to their boards to comply with the law, the group said. As of September, the percentage of board seats held by women climbed to more than 30% in California, compared to 26% nationally. Several European countries, including France, Germany, Norway and Spain, require corporate boards to include women.īefore the California law went into effect, women held 17% of the seats on company boards in the state, based on the Russell 3000 Index of the largest companies in the U.S., according to the advocacy group 50/50 Women on Boards. Illinois requires publicly traded companies to report the makeup of their boards. Washington state passed a similar measure this year and lawmakers in other states, including Massachusetts, New Jersey and Hawaii, have proposed similar bills. Supporters of the law said it has already had a big impact in California and beyond. Dresner and the state attorney general's office declined to comment on pending litigation. The state has argued in court papers that it hasn't used taxpayer funds to enforce the law. No companies have been fined, though the secretary of state can do so, said spokeswoman Jenna Dresner. More than half didn't file the required disclosure statement, according to the most recent report. Companies that do not include the required number of female board members can be fined $100,000 for first violations and $300,000 for subsequent violations.įewer than half the nearly 650 applicable corporations in the state reported last year that they had complied. Penalties range from $100,000 fines for companies that fail to report board compositions to the California secretary of state's office. By January, boards with five directors must have two women and boards with six or more members must have three women. The law required publicly traded companies headquartered in California to have one member who identifies as a woman on their boards of directors by the end of 2019. "Any time you try to make significant change to the status quo the powers that have been institutionalized to this kind of discrimination are likely to fight back.” “I find that to be incredibly ironic and hypocritical," Jackson said. She said the plaintiffs should be embarrassed for claiming the law is discriminatory. Corporations can meet the requirement by adding women without undermining the rights of male board members. Hannah-Beth Jackson, who authored the legislation, said the bill did not impose a quota because boards don't need a certain percentage of women. He said the state doesn't have a compelling government interest to create the mandate.Īnother conservative legal group has filed a separate lawsuit in federal court claiming the law violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. “They are creating a classification that either prefers or discriminates against one class or in preference of another,” attorney Robert Patrick Sticht said. The conservative legal group Judicial Watch brought the lawsuit claiming it's illegal to use taxpayer funds to enforce a law that violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution by mandating a gender-based quota. The California law has spurred other states to adopt or consider similar laws. Three years later, a judge will begin hearing evidence Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court that could undo the law credited with giving more women seats in boardrooms traditionally dominated by men. Jerry Brown signed the nation's first law requiring women on boards of publicly traded companies, he suggested it might not survive legal challenges. LOS ANGELES (AP) - When then-California Gov. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |